Ride the Tide: Observing CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing by the numbers

Targeted genome editing has become a powerful genetic tool for modification of DNA sequences in their natural chromosomal context. CRISPR RNA-guided nucleases have recently emerged as an efficient targeted editing tool for multiple organisms. Hereby a double strand break is introduced at a targeted DNA site. During DNA repair genomic alterations are introduced which can change the function of the DNA code. However, our understanding of how CRISPR works is incomplete and it is still hard to predict the CRISPR activity at the precise target sites. The highly ordered structure of the eukaryotic genome may play a role in this. The organization of the genome is controlled by dynamic changes of DNA methylation, histone modification, histone variant incorporation and nucleosome remodelling. The influence of nuclear organization and chromatin structure on transcription is reasonably well known, but we are just beginning to understand its effect on genome editing by CRISP

UV-induced G2 checkpoint depends on p38 MAPK and minimal activation of ATR-Chk1 pathway

In response to UV light, single-stranded DNA intermediates coated with replication protein A (RPA) are generated, which trigger the ATR-Chk1 checkpoint pathway. Recruitment and/or activation of several checkpoint proteins at the damaged sites is important for the subsequent cell cycle arrest. Surprisingly, upon UV irradiation, Rad9 and RPA only minimally accumulate at DNA lesions in G2 phase, suggesting that only a few single-stranded DNA intermediates are generated. Also, little phosphorylated Chk1 is observed in G2 phase after UV-irradiation, and UV light fails to elicit efficient accumulation of typical DNA damage response proteins at sites of damage in this phase. By contrast, p38 MAPK is phosphorylated in G2 phase cells after UV damage. Interestingly, despite the lack of an obvious activation of the ATR-Chk1 pathway, only the combined inhibition of the ATR- and p38-dependent pathways results in a complete abrogation of the UV-induced G2/M arrest. This suggests that UV light induces less hazardous lesions in G2 phase or that lesions created in this phase are less efficiently processed, resulting in a low activation of the ATR-Chk1 pathway. UV-induced G2 checkpoint activation in this situation therefore relies on signalling via the p38 MAPK and ATR-Chk1 signalling cascades